Module 8 · Lesson 6 of 6 · with Nova

Discover What AI Can Do Beyond Chat

Objective

Recognise which connected capabilities could make a real difference to a personal task.

A useful AI idea often begins with a frustration: copying information between tabs, finding the right document or repeating the same small preparation every week. You don't need to automate everything. You need to spot the opportunity.

Think of an activity you've done recently that involved searching for information, reading a document and preparing some kind of result. Perhaps you're researching a hobby, planning a voluntary event or getting ready for a course.

Now separate the stages. Which parts involved gathering information? Which needed a calculation or a comparison? Which required your judgement? Once you can see those stages, you can explore whether search, files, data analysis or a connected app would make the job easier.

Now imagine two versions of the task. In the first, AI suggests the steps. In the second, a connected plugin creates the document, updates a task list or prepares a draft in an app you already use. Ask which extra capability makes the real difference and which action you would want to approve.

This is where a chatbot starts to become an interface to useful capabilities. You don't have to build anything yet. By learning to recognise the tools around the conversation, you're preparing to design much more capable ways of working.

Imagine the last time you had to copy details from an email into a calendar, write the same information in a document and then send it to someone else. A conversational assistant could explain those steps, but a connected assistant might be able to create the calendar entry and draft the message. The opportunity lies in recognising the repeated transfer of information between tools.

One way to spot opportunities is to make a rough map of a task: where does information begin, what happens to it and where must the result end up? In a holiday-planning task, you might gather flight options, compare them in a table and create a shortlist. In a small business, you might read enquiries, prepare responses and log the next action. The pattern becomes visible when you describe the movement of information.

Now label the parts that require creativity, interpretation or judgement. An AI model may be valuable for summarising an enquiry, suggesting a response or extracting dates from varied writing. Other parts are straightforward software operations: adding numbers, storing a record or sending an authorised message. You don't need AI for every step just because the overall experience uses AI.

Consider the difference between a tool and an agent. A connected tool performs a particular operation when called. An agent-like workflow may plan or choose several steps towards a goal, using tools along the way. The more freedom you give the system, the more important it becomes to define permissions, stopping conditions and how it reports what it has actually completed.

There's no need to begin with the most autonomous version. Try asking an assistant to help prepare a single useful artefact, then perhaps create it in the relevant connected app. Once you've seen the benefit, look for a repeated sequence that could be supported with a template or scheduled process.

Your best opportunity might be very small. If AI can turn rough meeting notes into an editable action list, that may be more valuable than building an elaborate personal assistant. If the action list can then be stored in your team's existing tool, the result becomes part of the way work actually happens.

Ask yourself three questions before investing effort. Does this happen often enough to matter? Can I describe what a good result looks like? Is there a suitable, permitted way to access the information and create the output? If all three answers are yes, you've probably found something worth experimenting with.

You could try this method tomorrow with a small, harmless activity. Choose something you normally do across two apps, write down the steps and ask whether a connected assistant can create one of the outputs directly. If the answer is no, the exercise still teaches you something: which capability is missing, which permission would be required and whether the expected benefit is large enough to justify changing tools.

The aim is to stop thinking of AI only as somewhere you type a question. It can become a useful interface for finding information, shaping it and taking specific actions through tools. Learning to recognise those possibilities gives you far more practical leverage than memorising the name of every new feature.